Free Web Hosting by Netfirms
Web Hosting by Netfirms | Free Domain Names by Netfirms

Page 3
Home ] Up ] Page 2 ] [ Page 3 ] Page 4 ] Page 5 ] Page 6 ] Page 7 ] Page 8 ] Page 9 ] Page 10 ] Page 11 ] Page 12 ]

 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Continued from page 2

into the tentacles of the evil traps which these women weave in the name of Islam.

To discuss and argue rationally and academically with such agents of Iblees is an insult to Ilm and to the Deen. To become embroiled in an intelligent discussion with those who are afflicted with the accursed disease of lesbianism is like getting into a dispute with a drunken street-woman. Everyone knows how such a woman behaves. It is best to say to these evil women who are out to gain acclaim for them with their ideas of western kufr:

Unto you is your deen (of kufr) and unto us (Mu’mineen) is our Deen (of Islam).” (Qur’aan)

Q. Is the Eid Salaat of a menstruating woman valid?

A. We think the mutants in the women’s lib are in better position to issue a ‘fatwa’ on this silly question.

Q. Is it permissible for women to attend the Eid Gah?

A. It is not permissible. They invite the Wrath of Allah Ta’ala by discarding the Law of Islam which has came down in the Ummah from generation to generation from the time of the Sahaabah. All the miscreants and deviates of the world cannot change the Ahkaam of the Shariah no matter how much they shout, clamour, raise slogans and spit venom.

Q. What is the Shariah’s view on women who organize Eid Gahs and invite men and women to attend?

A. Such evil women are under the Wrath and Curse of Allah Ta’ala. They have no true relationship with Islam. They manipulate Islam to project their evil and shaitaaniyat. They are akin to those so-called Muslim males who have formed a “Muslim” society of homosexuals. These defeminized women are the counterparts of the vile, accursed society of Muslim homosexuals. Soon these miserable enemies of Islam will have achieved adequate audacity and shamelessness to publicly establish a society of ‘Islamic’ lesbians in the same way as the kuffaar masquerading as Muslims have initiated a society of ‘Muslim’ homosexuals. May Allah Ta’ala save Muslims from the fitnah which is erupting on all sides of the Ummah. In fact, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had predicted that the fitnah will spread in such abundance and swiftness like beads scattering from a broken string of beads. The fitnah of the defeminized women with lesbian tendencies is one such fitnah which is silently and imperceptibly creeping into the Muslim community.

THE RULERS OF WOMEN

Men are the rulers over women……. (Qur’aan)

This immutable decree of the Qur’aan will remain until Qiyaamah. All the women’s lib mutants and deviates with all their dayyooth spineless so-called males cannot succeed in their nefarious kufr attempt to mutilate the Deen of Allah Ta’ala.

Q. A boy and a girl who attend university had struck up a relationship. To end the sinful relationship they decided to perform nikah. But the parents refused because they wanted the couple to complete their studies. However, they decided to proceed with nikah without the consent and knowledge of their parents. The nikah was contracted over the phone. The boy had one witness by him and the girl had two witnesses. When the parents discovered this, they called an Imaam who said that the nikah was not valid. Another Maulana says that the nikah is valid. Please give the correct view of the Shariah.

A. The nikah was not contracted properly, hence it is not valid. The nikah should be repeated. It is a simple procedure. Someone should get the girl’s consent for her nikah to be performed. This person will then be her Wakeel (representative). The Wakeel, the boy (groom) and two witnesses should assemble at one place. The Wakeel should make the Ijaab (Proposal)by saying: “Aabidah has instructed me to contract her Nikah with you, Abdullah. Do you accept her in your Nikah?” The boy should then respond: “I have accepted her in my Nikah.” Both witnesses have to hear the Ijaab (Proposal) and the Qubool (Acceptance). The Nikah will then be valid even if no mehr is mentioned and even if the nikah khutbah is not recited. But it is best to recite the nikah khutbah. Anyone present may recite it. The mehr amount should also be arranged. The refusal of the parents is of no consequence, neither legally nor morally. Morally they have no right to refuse because in allowing their children to attend kuffaar university and strike up zina relationships they have abdicated and abandoned their Waajib parental responsibility. They have paved the path of Jahannam for their children. They thus have no Shar’i right to refuse when their children desire to rectify a haraam relationship and render it halaal. Parents should take note of this and not try to invoke their parental right and authority in such situations. Misdirected authority, be it parental authority, cannot be rewarded with obedience. Parents who are engrossed with their worldly affairs and oblivious of the Shariah, are insistent on sending their daughters to immoral secular institutions. They have no objection to the haraam and illicit relationships of zina which their sons and daughters strike up at university. The evil relationship continues for long periods with the tacit consent of fussaaq parents. But as soon as the children enter into nikah, a storm is let loose and everything is done in an attempt to break the union. Remember that parental blessings and the performance of Nikah in the Sunnat style with honour and joy are ingredients of a holy setting, not of a haraam relationship.

Q. Is it permissible to fix a specific Surah for Salaat?

A. It is not permissible to fix a specific Surah for any Salaat.

Q. Some people claim that somebody had practiced jadoo (magic, witchcraft) on them. They say they are accepting their fate with patience because jadoo was a sunnat that Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) lived through. Is there a basis for this claim?

A. Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) lived through shirk as well. But to claim that the shirk of the kuffaar is a sunnat merely because Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) lived through it, is ridiculous and baseless. Sihr (magic) is haraam. It cancels out Imaan. Surah Falaq and Surah Naas were specially revealed as a remedy for Sihr. To have patience when misfortune strikes is necessary and meritorious. But a haraam practice should not be described as Sunnat. The attitude of patience and submission to the decree of Allah Ta’ala adopted by our Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is Sunnat. It is important to understand that it is not permissible to accuse people of having committed sihr without having real evidence. The revelation produced by some amal of an aamil is not evidence in the Shariah.

Q. A man and his wife live in a house belonging to the husband’s father. In the absence of the husband, the wife’s father-in-law simply walks into the house and claims that he has the right to come and go as he wishes because the property belongs to him. Is he allowed to do so?

A. No, he is not allowed to do so. If his son is not at home, he should not unnecessarily visit his daughter-in-law. If need sometimes occasions a visit, he should seek permission from outside to enter. He may not simply step into the house without permission. Furthermore, he should not lounge around the house when his son is not present. His ownership of the property is not a licence for acting recklessly and disrespectfully. His action is fraught with fitnah.

SUPERIORITY OF MEN

Allah Ta’ala states in His Qur’aan Majeed:

“And for men is a rank over women.”

The equality of sex theme which the women’s lib miscreants pipe is refuted by the Qur’aan. The stupid fallacies of the kuffaar are alien to Qur’aanic culture.

Q. An 18 year Muslim girl did exceptionally well in her matriculation exam last year. She has now been employed at her Islamic school to teach mathematics to both girls and boys all of whom are baaligh. The explanation given is that even during the time of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) menfolk went to gain knowledge from the respected ladies of the Household of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Please comment.

A. People are really groveling and scraping the very bottom of the barrel of nafsaaniyat and jahaalat when they cite the Sahaabah and the Holy Wives of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) as substantiation for their practices which are stepping stones for zina of different degrees. These people are truly befogged in their minds with the liquor of their nafs to present the Sahaabah and the Holy Wives to back up their haraam practices. The Honourable Ladies of Rasulullah’s House never conducted a girls madrasah or a western secular school which is nowadays dubbed ‘Islamic’ school to deceive parents who have deceived themselves because they simply want to be deceived so that these evil secular schools can have some justification

Continued on page 4